The Guardian: Scientists trace evolution of Indo-European languages to Hittites

Scientists trace evolution of Indo-European languages to Hittites

, science editor

The Guardian, Thursday 27 November 2003 
The following correction was printed in the Guardian’s Corrections and Clarifications column, Saturday November 29 2003
Our report below seemed to imply that the Basque language was related to the Indo-European languages. In fact, the research to which the report referred makes no mention of Basque. Basque is a language isolate, “of no known relationship with any other language” (Collins dictionary).


At last the answer in black and white, or beltz and zuri if you happen to be Basque, or noir and blanc, if you are French. You owe the words to Hittite-speaking farmers from Anatolia, who invented agriculture and spread their words as they sowed their seed, 9,500 years ago.

Languages, like people, are related. Russell Gray of the University of Auckland, New Zealand, reports in Nature today that he and a colleague decided to treat language as if it was DNA and compared selected words from 87 languages to build an evolutionary tree of the Indo-European languages. This could help solve an old argument: who picked up the original language and began to spread gradually evolving versions of it across Europe and Asia?

For decades the focus has been on a tribe of nomad herders called the Kurgans from central Asia, who domesticated the horse 6,000 years ago and invaded Europe.

Others have argued that the Indo-European family of languages must have spread with barley and lentils – the first agriculturalists in the Fertile Crescent would have exported not just their techniques, but also the words that went with them.

Charles Darwin noted in 1871 that language seemed to have evolved in much the same way as animals and plants had. Dr Gray used the evolutionary approach three years ago to track the spread of languages from Asia eastwards across the Pacific.

This time he chose 2,449 words from 87 languages, including English, Lithuanian, Gujarati, Romany, Walloon, Breton, Hindi and Pennsylvania Dutch and began a series of comparisons to build up a pattern of descent.

The choice of words was critical, he says. “For example, English is a veritable fruit salad of a language, with chunks of vocabulary from the Celts, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Vikings, Normans, and slices of Latin, French, Greek, and Italian tossed with some more recent garnishes from Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Hindi. There is even the odd Polynesian borrowing, like tattoo,” he said. “Ninety nine per cent of words in the Oxford English Dictionary are in fact borrowings from other languages.”

But English has a basic vocabulary of 200 words – star, dog, earth, blood, woman, year and so on – which can be linked to an original shared language.

The answer is that words were on the move long before horses. Dr Gray’s language tree ended with its roots in Anatolia in modern Turkey around 7,500BC, when villagers speaking a form of Hittite kindled pahhur, or fire, to boil watar, or water, before setting out on pad, or foot, to spread the good word.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s